Many WRC cases against employers are lost or challenged by companies not following their own procedures! In addition, investigations, disciplinaries and appeals being carried out by the same parties in companies is in breach of natural justice.
Therefore, being pre-emptive, building robust and clear policies and procedures incorporating best practice and reviewing them regularly, with the guidance of an experienced employment expert, can help prevent misunderstandings, provide clarity to employers and employees, and reduce the risks both financially and operationally to the organisation
Although the Codes of Practice on Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures (S.I. No. 146/2000 - Industrial Relations Act, 1990 (Declaration) Order, 2000 clearly sets out best practice, as a guide to carrying out grievance and disciplinary procedures, internal company procedures and policies are the primary driver, as agreed between employers and employees as part of the terms and conditions of employment. Primarily the role of the WRC is not to carry out the grievance and disciplinary again, their role is to ensure proper procedures were followed, especially in line with best practice guidelines.
In conjunction, of course, all employees should be given a fair right of transparency of the alleged breaches and documents / evidence, copies of investigation reports, in advance, and a right of reply and representation
In addition, appeals hearing, once clear in the procedures, and made within the requisite timeframes, should be assessed independently by an appeals panel or person not previously involved in any disciplinary process previously in relation to the matter in question.
The above is the primary reason independent expert employment guidance and support is needed to ensure a factually based clear and robust process and procedure is carried out diligently and professionally in the interest of all parties, and especially for employers to pre-empt potential litigation.
Why not talk to me about where to start with potential disciplinary sanctions? What to do? How to do it? What approach to take and what if any, fact finding pre-emptive work may be required beforehand to ensure compliance with best practice.
Costings and timeframes can be set out on a case-by-case basis subject to the best needs of the case, and as always, all proposals will be clearly set out in advance of any work commencement.
Any further questions about Disciplinary Procedures & Appeals, take a look at our FAQs and get in contact.